Monday, May 30, 2005

New Post Finally

How can two weeks go by sooo quickly? I was really enjoying the blogging and then got caught up in the hum drum of life and haven't been back in the saddle for two weeks.

I did write an ariticle about new homes in Indiana, and really the article applies to homes in every place. It's important to note that all areas have a Commissioner or Councilman like we do that actually says things like "I don't want those kind of people living in my community." Yes it's patently racist and probably fascist, but it's accepatable in a culture that says if you're afraid you're allowed to say horrible things.

New Home Blueprint #1 (I'll be writing a series of articles over the next 20 weeks)
Why all the battles between home builders and politicians lately?

There is a battle at hand … and that battle is for the heart of our economy. You may think that a reference to the steel industry or manufacturing comes next … NO!

The heart and soul of Porter County’s economy is construction. More specifically construction of new homes. While other industries have fallen or left, construction has continued at a break-neck pace heretofore unmatched in the history of this region. With interest rates at 30 year lows and population growth rates expected to double in the future, that demand will continue. Mark this comment for posterity, people want new homes. Some politicians may be “against” new homes, some politicians may even try to take options away from the people … but people create a demand for new homes not the much degraded and downtrodden home builder.

While Northwest Indiana continues to see continuous growth in the home building industry, we raise the question – when will housing for regular people be ended? Are those days gone we ask? Possibly…and how unfortunate and how foolish that would be. If our economy is to grow, regular families with good jobs and strong commitments to community will need places to live. Some county politicos may not want “those people” living close … but I sure do. Now it’s one thing to take pot-shots at politicos, but the question we all need to ask is: what can we really do about maintaining housing for porter county’s workers?

Some action steps:
1. Inform your county commissioners and councilmen that you are firmly for economic development and the creation of jobs for real working people. Real people that have to have a place to live. Real people who should have the option of buying a new home if they so choose.

2. If you own your home, take a serious look at the home buying options in the market today. A scare tactic is sophomoric but it is true that we won’t maintain 30 year lows on long term interest rates for ever. You may want to buy a home now … they only go up in price.

3. If you are a renter. STOP RENTING. Did you know that when the county council passes the small income tax increase that is required to become part of the RDA, a terrific economic development vehicle, that about half that income tax will go to reducing the property tax on “owner occupied” homes? If you rent you’ll never see that benefit.

If you rent, you’re losing out on the federal tax benefit of a mortgage interest deduction.

If you rent, you’re losing out on the chance to ride the appreciation wave that only housing seems able to maintain. We’ve increased housing values every year since 1981. That’s a pretty accurate gauge of investment potential

4. If you are a business owner looking to grow in Porter County, make sure you are loud and clear in your support for access to housing for working people. Your employees need to have homes, homes that are safe, homes that will appreciate, homes that they can be proud to own.

5. If you are a politician. Woe to you that attack the “preponderance” of new homes overtaking out county. Such small minded scare tactics will merely banish you from constructive talk about quality of life in our great county. Your constituents want new homes. You have no right to take their options away from them. Worse, you could be helping local companies make the decision to eliminate workers or even outsource overseas just to make your neighborhood “upper class.” Can you afford to alienate the entire middle income population of Porter County? Can you afford to have the next outsource laid at your feet?


Why the angst, you may question? Ah, the culmination of the point … the dénouement they call it in literature.

A new home in Porter County can no longer be built for less than $100,000! Not with local agencies pocketing thousands for “tapping” into sewers … Mind you the actual cost of a “tap” is only about $200 total they just grab more. Not with the county’s foolish Open Space Ordinance written specifically to keep “those people” out and only allow big estate homes on multi acre lots. Not with the current mind-set among politicians that the home builder, once a prized profession, is the enemy of society or worse the “easy” guy to tax. One Porter County city, even suggested raising their permit fees 200% … why you ask … because they had more people doing the same job and therefore deserved more money.

It’s high time we rekindled our commitment to workers in Porter County and home buying options aplenty for all our citizens.

Steve Dalton
Synergy Homes


Next: New Homes Blueprint #2 How do I choose a new home builder, there’s so many!

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Why are you not upset about the $9/month trash collection fee that your buddy Costas started? I voted for Costas and now I am pissed off-- talk about taking more money out of your pockets- they won't call it a tax, just a "user fee." IT IS WRONG-- you live out of the city limits; I live in the city-- they say "private trash pick up is $15-20/month,"-- I don't care! I pay higher property taxes to cover this stuff than you and now thay are getting me again. I am beginning to think that Costas has thrown us under the bus and is just another typical politician trying to get more money-- I don't need a fancy trash can that says VALPO.ORG on it. Save us all some money-- blog on that you COSTAS POLITICAL HACK!

daltonsbriefs said...

Maybe we should name the trash tax the "Butterfield 20 years of trash tax"

He screwed up the city

Do we blame China on Nixon for starting a solution, or on the Communists?

Do we blame the Soviet Union on Reagan for pushing the wall to come down, or on Lenin and Stalin?

Do we blame Hiroshima on American, the only way to get the Japs attention, or on the Japanese Emperor?

Dont be so daft as to think that a solution will always solve the problem without some short term pain. Hiroshima hurt!!!!

Anonymous said...

Why does everyone always blame the last guy in office-- isn't it time to take a stand and do what is right? I didn't like Butterfield any more than you did.

This is taxation without representation!

Costas should stand up for what is right-- in the true conservative vain you CUT SPENDING elsewhere and DO NOT RAISE TAXES-- tell me I am wrong, or are you a hypocrite? You too should be outraged-- how is this any different than the county charging YOU BUILDERS a higher user fee for permits or sewer lines-- it isn't! User fees are just taxes, no way around it. I am disgusted that this isn't getting any press.

Short term pain is the liberal answer to everything-- you know as well as I that once this so called "user fee" is in place it will never go away, how is this SHORT TERM? Do you not see the light here? Costas is no different on this issue than your typical liberal and you are a hypocrite! I voted for Costas and am very disappointed on this issue. I don't need a new stinking trash can, I just spent $50 to buy two new ones, and now they tell me I can put those on the curb and the city will pick those up for me (no charge).

If we have a fiscal problem in this city why not open the trash pick up to a bid situation and let the private firms work there free market magic? Get rid of the city trash guys, don't pay them their high wages and let competition rule-- save the city some money there! I look forward to your reply.

daltonsbriefs said...

I would agree that taxation under the heading "short term pain" is an overused rationalization. Incidentally I would also agree that outsourcing the trash pick-up would be a terrific idea ... they tried that in Indianapolis and it saved quite a bit of money. Let's do it!!!

My challenge to the council has been, find enough dollars to fix your roads. Then identify a budget that will maintain them while continuously reducing the property tax levy against property.

Sales taxes, income taxes and use fees have all been shown to be much more fair and much more accurate. If we tax consumption we create an incentive to save. If we tax inventory or property we give an incentive to consume.

I would advocate a gradual elimination of property and inventory taxes statewide.

Now hypocrite is a strong word. My fight against "impact fees" is thus: if you want to sell me a service like sewer, use your bond to put in the infrastructure and charge a fee for service, reserves and paying down that bond. It just so happens that a profit can be turned on a continual annuity for a service like sewer. Ask NIPSCO they make money everyday.

To brand home builders "tree killers and slum lords" just because they are easy targets, misses the point. Home buyers want new homes ... they create the demand ... not builders.

As for Butterfield and his do-nothing administration, let's just say that we will agree on the big stuff and disagree on some of the minor solutions. If you get better streets and curbs and handicap ramps and sidewalks, chalk it up to a "street use fee" and consider the trash cans "free"

Anonymous said...

I agree that user fees, such as tolls are the most fair tax-- but I also know that these fees don't go away after the original project is completed.

Once all the side walks and roads are fixed-- does the "fee" go away? I don't think so. Look at the toll system in Ill. What a waste. If Costas was serious, he would side the bill (so to speak) and say that the "fee" expires in 2008 or something like that. My point is to stand by your core beliefs and don't comprimise-- politician don't do that-- just look at Sen. Bayh-- I will never vote for him again.

I don't like fees or taxes. I still believe the best way to solve this problem (not knowing the city budget) is to cut elsewhere or annex more land and raise your property taxes! Just kidding.